|
|
Dogs are considered to be mans best friend, and that is likely due to the fact that they are the earliest know animals to become domesticated.
Colette
Objectives/GoalsI investigated whether dogs are intelligent enough to recognize visual and scent queues the way they understand verbal queues. I also wondered which sense they respond better to: sight, scent, or both. Methods/MaterialsThree sets of non-verbal queues were used to get my pet dog Terra to obey each of three different actions: sit, down, and shake. The queuing methods were: 1) a blank sheet of paper with a unique scent for each command, 2) the same scents on lettered paper for each command, and 3) the same lettered paper with no scents for each command. Each of the three sets of paper queues was shown to the dog three times a session for each of the three actions for a total of 27 measurements a session. We had a session almost every day for 17 days. ResultsThere are four major findings from my experiment:
1) There is much scatter in the data from day to day. This is probably due to several factors, but one
important thing we noticed was that Terra had quickly learned to #guess' by trying all three tasks in a
row. This made it difficult to judge success, and it was hard to keep a regular standard. Some nights I
went a little soft, and other nights I was stricter. Conclusions/DiscussionThe overall conclusion is that, at least for our dog, it would take a lot longer than 17 days for her to catch on to #reading# (recognizing written symbols or scents). 3rd party site: http://www.usc.edu/CSSF/History/2005/Panels/J0331.pdf
Copyright © 2003 - 2010 Super Science Fair Projects - All Rights Reserved.
|